Epistimologi Burhani Al-Ghazali dan Ibnu Rusyd: Studi komparasi

Sutoyip, Niki and Soleh, Achmad Khudori ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5145-6046 (2023) Epistimologi Burhani Al-Ghazali dan Ibnu Rusyd: Studi komparasi. Refleksi: Jurnal Filsafat dan Pemikiran Islam, 25 (2). pp. 288-308. ISSN 2548-4745

Text 19897.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike. Download (4MB)

Abstract

This research focuses on analyzing the thoughts of Al-Ghazali, who comes from the East and Ibn Rushd, who comes from the West, regarding logic (Burhani), which has differences between the two figures regarding their Burhani
epistemology. According to Al-Ghazali's view, this revelation has definite credibility. compared to reason, because revelation comes from God, here Ibn Rushd is of the view that revelation and reason complement each other, because without rational reason revelation cannot be understood. The aim of this research is to provide scientific answers about the thoughts of these two figures in terms of Islamic philosophy, as well as providing reflective reading for the general public. The method used in this research is (Library Research). The results of this research produce four paradigm models, 1) regarding the elaboration of Burhani epistemology regarding sources (reason ratio), methods (abstraction, bahtsyyah,
tahliliyah, and naqdiyyah) and verification (exploration, verification, and explanation), 2) Burhani thinking according to Al-Ghazali's views are good regarding sources (reality of reason), methods (five senses and ratios), verification (analogy of ratios) and the position of revelation, 3) burhani thoughts according to Ibn Rushd are good regarding sources (rational reason), methods (syllogisms), verification (the superiority of the premise and suitability to the final goal) and the position of revelation, 4) and will be presented regarding the epistemology of the two figures, both similarities and differences relating to the realm of spiritual
epistemology, as well as the position of reason in the perspective of the two figures. The weakness of this research is that it has not explained in a coherent manner the burhani epistemology of the two figures, and whether the examples and methodological heritage between the two figures are still relevant for use today.

Item Type:	Journal Article
Keywords:	Burhani; al-Ghazali; Ibn Rusyd; Islamic Philosophy
Subjects:	22 PHILOSOPHY AND RELIGIOUS STUDIES > 2203 Philosophy
Divisions:	Faculty of Psychology
Depositing User:	Dr Achmad Khudori Soleh
Date Deposited:	03 Jul 2024 14:32

Downloads

Origin of downloads

Actions (login required)

View Item