Wrong writing in the Qur'an: Paleographic studies as a critique of the Luxenburg Thesis

Zakiyah, Ermita ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2172-1283, Riyadi, Abdul Kadir and Yani, Achmad (2024) Wrong writing in the Qur'an: Paleographic studies as a critique of the Luxenburg Thesis. Jurnal At-Tibyan: Jurnal Ilmu Alqur'an dan Tafsir, 9 (1). pp. 51-71. ISSN 2442-594X

Text 20053.pdf Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (365kB)

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to answer the thesis presented by Luxenberg. He states that the Qur'an is not Arabic. He assumes that the Qur'an has errors in its writing. The letters develop and are not by the beginning of its revelation. The tradition that changed from memorized tradition to written tradition also has a high possibility of being wrong, according to Luxenberg. This research uses the theory of interpretation criticism because what Luxenberg states as an orientalist is very different from the Islamic scientific tradition. The data analysis in this research uses literature data. Luxenberg's statement was analyzed and criticized using Islamic science and Palaeography. By using the theory and data analysis, it is established that Luxenberg's thesis is erroneous because the wrong writing of the Qur'an will never happen, either with the paleographic study presented by Luxenberg or with the study of the History of the Qur'an from the time of the Prophet until codification.

Item Type:	Journal Article
Keywords:	Wrong Writing; Palaeography; Luxenberg Thesis
Subjects:	22 PHILOSOPHY AND RELIGIOUS STUDIES > 2204 Religion and Religious Studies > 220403 Islamic Studies 22 PHILOSOPHY AND RELIGIOUS STUDIES > 2204 Religion and Religious Studies > 220403 Islamic Studies > 22040301 Al-Quran, Tafsir and related science
Divisions:	Faculty of Psychology
Depositing User:	Ermita Zakiyah
Date Deposited:	26 Jul 2024 09:05

Downloads

Origin of downloads

Actions (login required)

View Item